PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHAMX vs. FWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A (FHAMX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAMX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than FWLSX's 12.35% return.


FHAMX

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.65%
6M
2.37%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.81%

FWLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.41%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHAMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A
3.65%9.85%3.83%7.83%-11.91%2.52%8.33%10.27%-2.26%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
12.35%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAMX and FWLSX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FHAMX and FWLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHAMX vs. FWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHAMX
FHAMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FHAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A (FHAMX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHAMXFWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.42

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

10.11

-1.58

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAMX and FWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAMX drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum FWLSX drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAMX and FWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHAMXFWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-31.32%

+14.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.74%

-9.49%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-15.38%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

-27.40%

+11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-2.17%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-5.36%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

2.27%

-1.35%

Volatility

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A (FHAMX) is 1.70%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that FHAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHAMXFWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

4.39%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.65%

12.17%

-7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.25%

14.21%

-8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.55%

15.36%

-9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

16.10%

-11.04%

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAMX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FWLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHAMX vs. FWLSX - Dividend Comparison

FHAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FWLSX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHAMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A
2.33%2.92%2.75%2.62%4.35%3.72%2.35%2.17%1.39%0.00%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
4.08%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHAMX and FWLSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FWLSX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FHAMX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAMX dropped -16.37% vs FWLSX's -31.32%.

FWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHAMX and FWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer