FGVMX vs. SEDAX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

FGVMX (Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A) and SEDAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FGVMX returned 3.59%/yr vs 3.85%/yr for SEDAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGVMX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for SEDAX.

Performance

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGVMX having a 4.29% return and SEDAX slightly higher at 4.48%.

FGVMX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 11.82%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: —

SEDAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: 4.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGVMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A	4.29%	14.54%	6.49%	13.64%	-16.28%	-2.62%	4.21%	10.58%	0.12%
SEDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	4.48%	20.33%	3.13%	12.86%	-14.53%	-4.93%	4.68%	15.55%	-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FGVMX and SEDAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018	0.78

The correlation between FGVMX and SEDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGVMX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGVMX

FGVMX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FGVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FGVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FGVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FGVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FGVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SEDAX

SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 79
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGVMX	SEDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	2.48	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	3.90	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.52	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	2.60	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.56	10.35	+5.21

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGVMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the SEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGVMX and SEDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGVMX drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum SEDAX drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGVMX and SEDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGVMX	SEDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.36%	-37.03%	+9.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.80%	-5.49%	+1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.47%	-9.44%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.36%	-26.86%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.52%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-6.77%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	1.37%	-0.50%

Volatility

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) is 1.16%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that FGVMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGVMX	SEDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	1.62%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.65%	5.13%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	5.77%	-1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.61%	7.04%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.25%	8.39%	-1.14%

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGVMX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGVMX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

FGVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than SEDAX's 8.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGVMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A	4.62%	4.80%	4.42%	4.86%	3.68%	3.20%	3.76%	4.56%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	8.63%	7.30%	7.24%	4.65%	2.08%	4.69%	1.52%	3.75%	3.17%	4.70%	3.59%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGVMX and SEDAX in my portfolio?

FGVMX and SEDAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGVMX or SEDAX?

SEDAX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to FGVMX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGVMX dropped -27.36% vs SEDAX's -37.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGVMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.