FGSMX vs. XILSX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C (FGSMX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX).

FGSMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 4, 2018. XILSX is managed by Amundi. It was launched on Dec 16, 2014.

Performance

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C (FGSMX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGSMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C	-0.40%	8.71%	8.28%	9.98%	-13.86%	2.76%	1.26%	13.21%	-2.73%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	6.00%	18.70%	18.93%	18.65%	1.23%	-1.10%	7.37%	2.60%	-2.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSMX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 6.00% return.

FGSMX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: 7.88%
• 5Y*: 2.81%
• 10Y*: —

XILSX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 6.00%
• 6M: 12.03%
• 1Y: 26.11%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSMX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.

XILSX

Pioneer ILS Interval Fund

FGSMX

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C

Return for Risk

FGSMX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSMX

FGSMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FGSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FGSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FGSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FGSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FGSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

XILSX

XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C (FGSMX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGSMX	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	8.44	-6.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	73.85	-71.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	32.11	-30.66
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	124.30	-121.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	774.78	-764.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSMX and XILSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGSMX	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	8.44	-6.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	3.23	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.60	-1.07

Correlation

The correlation between FGSMX and XILSX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

FGSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than XILSX's 8.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGSMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C	5.01%	5.40%	5.06%	4.39%	3.08%	3.18%	3.69%	4.08%	0.80%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	8.97%	9.51%	13.06%	12.82%	2.68%	2.04%	5.20%	6.63%	6.40%

Drawdowns

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSMX drawdown since its inception was -22.51%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSMX and XILSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGSMX	XILSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.51%	-14.53%	-7.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-0.21%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.99%	-6.27%	-10.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	0.00%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-5.00%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	0.03%	+0.74%

Volatility

FGSMX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class C (FGSMX) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 1.02%. This indicates that FGSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGSMX	XILSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	1.02%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.30%	2.28%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.94%	3.11%	+0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.26%	3.77%	+1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.39%	3.96%	+2.43%