FGSM vs. WDIV
FGSM (Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF) and WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FGSM is actively managed, while WDIV is passively managed. Over the past year, FGSM returned 44.14% vs 29.22% for WDIV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGSM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDIV.
Performance
FGSM vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSM achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than WDIV's 7.19% return.
FGSM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 44.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 29.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
FGSM vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 10.20% | 21.33% | 0.24% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 7.19% | 27.16% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSM and WDIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FGSM and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSM vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FGSM
WDIV
FGSM vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSM | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 3.03 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.13 | 4.35 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.55 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.55 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.36 | 13.73 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSM | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 3.03 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.46 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
FGSM vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSM drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum WDIV drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSM and WDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSM | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -42.34% | +24.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -8.61% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -2.18% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -5.89% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.23% | +0.28% |
Volatility
FGSM vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) at 3.99%. This indicates that FGSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGSM | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 3.99% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 7.42% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 9.74% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 12.71% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 15.40% | +2.69% |
FGSM vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSM vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison
FGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than WDIV's 4.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.41% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.08% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |