FGSM vs. SYZ
FGSM (Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF) and SYZ (Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGSM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Frontier, while SYZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Lazard. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGSM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SYZ.
Performance
FGSM vs. SYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSM achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly lower than SYZ's 18.27% return.
FGSM
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 6M
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 33.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYZ
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 18.27%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGSM vs. SYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.03% | 3.35% |
SYZ Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF | 18.27% | 0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSM and SYZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSM vs. SYZ — Risk / Return Rank
FGSM
SYZ
FGSM vs. SYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) and Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF (SYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSM | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSM | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 1.68 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FGSM vs. SYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSM drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, which is greater than SYZ's maximum drawdown of -8.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSM and SYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSM | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -8.00% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -2.08% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
FGSM vs. SYZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGSM | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 16.62% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 16.62% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 16.62% | +1.18% |
FGSM vs. SYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SYZ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSM vs. SYZ - Dividend Comparison
FGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than SYZ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.56% |
SYZ Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGSM and SYZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SYZ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SYZ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FGSM.
FGSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.14% for SYZ.
FGSM is categorized as Global Equities, while SYZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FGSM and 0.60% for SYZ.
Find the right allocation for FGSM and SYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer