PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 9.66% return.


FGSI

1D
1.53%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.03%
1Y
9.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
-4.55%
1M
31.38%
YTD
9.66%
6M
9.66%
1Y
96.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and WNTR is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI
FGSI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FGSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSI Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGSIWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.29

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

5.89

-2.34

FGSI vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSI and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-42.65%

+34.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-42.65%

+34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-10.54%

+10.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-20.69%

+18.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

16.68%

-14.12%

Volatility

FGSI vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is 4.02%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 20.51%. This indicates that FGSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

20.51%

-16.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

47.31%

-37.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

53.75%

-41.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

53.64%

-41.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

53.64%

-41.14%

FGSI vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, less than WNTR's 101.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and WNTR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (20.51%) compared to FGSI (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSI dropped -8.25% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 96.96% vs 9.08% for FGSI. On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FGSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 96.96% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 101.22%, compared with 8.24% for FGSI.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer