PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return.


FGSI

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.18%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCLN

1D
-0.41%
1M
16.40%
YTD
52.94%
6M
50.79%
1Y
120.21%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and QCLN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.48

FGSI vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
QCLN

Technology

30.5%
20.8%

Healthcare

17.6%

-

Financial Services

16.2%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
9.4%

Industrials

12.4%
30.2%

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Energy

4.8%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
9.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

13.2%

Technology

FGSI
30.5%
QCLN
20.8%

Healthcare

FGSI
17.6%
QCLN

-

Financial Services

FGSI
16.2%
QCLN
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.6%
QCLN
9.4%

Industrials

FGSI
12.4%
QCLN
30.2%

Communication Services

FGSI
5.7%
QCLN

-

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
QCLN
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.0%
QCLN

-

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
QCLN
9.4%

Real Estate

FGSI

-

QCLN

-

Utilities

FGSI

-

QCLN
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGSI vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSIQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.20

+0.64

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-76.18%

+67.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-20.99%

+19.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-43.45%

+41.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

Volatility

FGSI vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

34.88%

-22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.43%

37.97%

-25.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

34.91%

-22.48%

FGSI vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGSI
First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
7.57%4.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.15%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and QCLN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FGSI.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.60% for QCLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer