PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 942.01% return.


FGSI

1D
-1.58%
1M
1.48%
YTD
3.69%
6M
2.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BWET

1D
-4.41%
1M
8.17%
YTD
942.01%
6M
777.15%
1Y
1,888.50%
3Y*
137.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and BWET is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

-0.08

FGSI vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
BWET

Technology

30.5%

-

Healthcare

17.6%

-

Financial Services

16.2%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Industrials

12.4%

-

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FGSI
30.5%
BWET

-

Healthcare

FGSI
17.6%
BWET

-

Financial Services

FGSI
16.2%
BWET
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.6%
BWET

-

Industrials

FGSI
12.4%
BWET

-

Communication Services

FGSI
5.7%
BWET

-

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
BWET

-

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.0%
BWET

-

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
BWET

-

Real Estate

FGSI

-

BWET

-

Utilities

FGSI

-

BWET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGSI vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSIBWETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.95

-1.24

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and BWET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-56.90%

+48.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-5.28%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-24.03%

+22.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

Volatility

FGSI vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

98.89%

-86.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

70.71%

-58.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

70.71%

-58.21%

FGSI vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and BWET have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.67%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 3.50% for BWET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and BWET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer