FGRU vs. BTCZ
FGRU (T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGRU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR), while BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex. FGRU is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FGRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGRU
- 1D
- -7.59%
- 1M
- -50.23%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.99%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- YTD
- 34.44%
- 1Y
- 86.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -51.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.31M | $113.00M | $118.94M | |
| $406.99K | $601.26K | $773.35K |
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGRU T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF | -74.82% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRU and BTCZ is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGRU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
FGRU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTCZ
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGRU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRU drawdown since its inception was -74.82%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRU and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.82% | -91.06% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.82% | -78.32% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.84% | -73.91% | +28.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.54% | — |
Volatility
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGRU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 190.58% | 89.06% | +101.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 190.58% | 95.65% | +94.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 190.58% | 95.65% | +94.93% |
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGRU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
FGRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
FGRU T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGRU and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FGRU.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for FGRU.
FGRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for FGRU and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for FGRU and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer