FGRTX vs. FSUVX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) and FSUVX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FGRTX returned 16.61%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for FSUVX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGRTX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for FSUVX.

Performance

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRTX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRTX has outperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 16.61%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.

FGRTX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 30.02%
• 3Y*: 24.66%
• 5Y*: 17.05%
• 10Y*: 16.61%

FSUVX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 4.08%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 13.20%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	10.11%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	12.96%	31.07%	-7.44%	16.98%
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	4.08%	11.03%	17.40%	14.80%	-10.93%	21.51%	9.86%	27.73%	1.35%	17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRTX and FSUVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015	0.79

The correlation between FGRTX and FSUVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGRTX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FSUVX

FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGRTX	FSUVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.42	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.03	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.25	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.66	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.80	6.96	+7.84

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRTX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRTX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRTX and FSUVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRTX	FSUVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.17%	-32.41%	-23.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-7.28%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.51%	-11.55%	-6.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-19.48%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.18%	-32.41%	-2.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-2.18%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.71%	-3.27%	-5.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.73%	+0.29%

Volatility

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that FGRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRTX	FSUVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	2.68%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	6.53%	+3.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.50%	8.56%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	12.98%	+3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.15%	15.19%	+2.96%

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRTX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRTX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than FSUVX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.53%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	4.28%	4.45%	2.25%	1.74%	4.12%	3.52%	1.31%	3.80%	2.63%	2.94%	2.23%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRTX and FSUVX in my portfolio?

FGRTX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGRTX or FSUVX?

FGRTX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to FSUVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRTX dropped -56.17% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.