FGROX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).

FGROX is a passively managed fund by Emerald that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2008. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	-5.85%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	27.63%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	-13.03%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGROX achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -13.03% return.

FGROX

• 1D: -3.15%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: -5.85%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 41.68%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: 6.14%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -8.63%
• YTD: -13.03%
• 6M: -12.06%
• 1Y: 14.49%
• 3Y*: 19.68%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGROX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

FGROX

Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class

FSPGX

Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund

Return for Risk

FGROX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGROX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.66	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	1.10	+0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.15	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	0.72	+1.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	2.51	+6.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGROX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGROX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGROX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	0.66	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.56	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.78	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FGROX and FSPGX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.10%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	12.10%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.40%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Drawdowns

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGROX drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGROX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGROX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.48%	-32.66%	-8.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.38%	-16.17%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.52%	-32.66%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.36%	-16.17%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.33%	-6.43%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	4.63%	-0.58%

Volatility

FGROX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.33%. This indicates that FGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGROX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.86%	5.33%	+4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.40%	11.79%	+7.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.75%	22.32%	+6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.27%	21.46%	+3.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.98%	21.63%	+3.35%