FGRIX vs. XLP

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

FGRIX (Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both funds - FGRIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. FGRIX is actively managed, while XLP is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGRIX returned 14.64%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for XLP. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGRIX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.

Performance

FGRIX vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRIX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRIX has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 14.64%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.

FGRIX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 8.49%
• 1Y: 23.33%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

XLP

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 7.50%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: 7.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRIX vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGRIX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio	7.83%	21.59%	22.10%	18.63%	-4.98%	25.84%	7.98%	30.22%	-8.94%	16.88%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	10.66%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRIX and XLP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between FGRIX and XLP has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FGRIX vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGRIX	XLP
Technology	21.7%	-
Industrials	17.7%	-
Financial Services	16.6%	-
Healthcare	11.8%	-
Energy	10.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	99.0%
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	1.0%
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

FGRIX vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRIX

FGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRIX vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGRIX	XLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.67	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	1.04	+1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.12	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	0.88	+1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	1.70	+9.32

FGRIX vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRIX and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGRIX vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRIX drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRIX and XLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRIX	XLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.10%	-35.90%	-31.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.35%	-9.69%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.42%	-12.39%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.26%	-16.30%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.62%	-24.51%	-11.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-4.50%	+4.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-7.06%	-3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	5.02%	-3.02%

Volatility

FGRIX vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) is 3.25%, while State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that FGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRIX	XLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	4.55%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	10.13%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	12.85%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	13.34%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	14.75%	+2.71%

FGRIX vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRIX vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

FGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, more than XLP's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRIX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio	9.08%	9.78%	6.80%	3.93%	3.43%	6.02%	3.61%	2.85%	3.39%	1.52%	1.80%	2.08%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.54%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRIX and XLP in my portfolio?

FGRIX and XLP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGRIX or XLP?

XLP has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to FGRIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRIX dropped -67.10% vs XLP's -35.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.