PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQMX vs. RPHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class A (FGQMX) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQMX achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than RPHIX's 1.76% return.


FGQMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
3.58%
6M
4.27%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*

RPHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.31%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGQMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class A
3.58%9.53%9.11%10.67%-13.27%3.43%2.05%13.94%-2.68%
RPHIX
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund
1.76%4.76%6.71%5.87%2.97%2.05%1.95%2.77%-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQMX and RPHIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQMX vs. RPHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQMX
FGQMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FGQMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RPHIX
RPHIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
RPHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RPHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class A (FGQMX) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGQMXRPHIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

5.17

-1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.73

10.99

-5.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

3.74

-1.94

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

43.68

-38.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.34

122.56

-98.22

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is lower than the RPHIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQMX and RPHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGQMXRPHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

5.17

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

3.68

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

2.96

-2.25

Drawdowns

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQMX drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, which is greater than RPHIX's maximum drawdown of -3.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQMX and RPHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQMXRPHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.40%

-3.16%

-19.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-0.10%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.05%

-0.72%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-0.92%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-0.09%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.04%

+0.42%

Volatility

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class A (FGQMX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) at 0.24%. This indicates that FGQMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQMXRPHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.24%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

0.59%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

0.88%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

1.26%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

1.20%

+5.16%

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RPHIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQMX vs. RPHIX - Dividend Comparison

FGQMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than RPHIX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGQMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class A
6.09%6.14%5.81%5.13%3.68%3.83%4.44%4.82%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RPHIX
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund
4.08%4.76%6.40%5.08%3.46%2.03%2.44%2.85%2.83%2.68%2.63%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQMX and RPHIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGQMX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to RPHIX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGQMX dropped -22.40% vs RPHIX's -3.16%.

RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQMX and RPHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer