FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FGQI.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD) and TDIV.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - FGQI.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income Index, while TDIV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGQI.L returned 10.96%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for TDIV.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGQI.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDIV.L.

Performance

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQI.L achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV.L's 11.84% return.

FGQI.L

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 7.76%
• YTD: 10.84%
• 1Y: 22.97%
• 3Y*: 16.20%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: —

TDIV.L

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 10.53%
• YTD: 11.84%
• 1Y: 29.81%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 17.81%
• 10Y*: 13.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGQI.L Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD	10.84%	20.08%	11.79%	17.99%	-10.78%	22.22%	10.14%	27.77%	-7.59%	16.89%
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	11.84%	40.41%	8.93%	15.44%	9.29%	18.14%	-2.30%	37.03%	-6.76%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQI.L and TDIV.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017	0.73

The correlation between FGQI.L and TDIV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQI.L

FGQI.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FGQI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FGQI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FGQI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FGQI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

TDIV.L

TDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGQI.L	TDIV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.65	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	3.61	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.48	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	5.64	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	15.83	-4.15

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQI.L and TDIV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQI.L drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, smaller than the maximum TDIV.L drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQI.L and TDIV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGQI.L	TDIV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.05%	-37.94%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.04%	-5.27%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.79%	-13.89%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.11%	-18.52%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	0.00%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-3.99%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.88%	+0.08%

Volatility

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) is 2.64%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that FGQI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGQI.L	TDIV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	2.90%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	8.56%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.16%	11.22%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	14.56%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.67%	16.20%	-0.53%

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGQI.L vs. TDIV.L - Dividend Comparison

FGQI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than TDIV.L's 3.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGQI.L Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD	1.78%	1.81%	2.32%	2.71%	2.77%	2.52%	2.45%	2.34%	2.78%	1.50%
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	3.10%	3.49%	4.36%	4.82%	4.49%	4.14%	3.88%	4.37%	5.77%	4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGQI.L and TDIV.L in my portfolio?

FGQI.L and TDIV.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FGQI.L or TDIV.L?

On fees, TDIV.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGQI.L or TDIV.L?

TDIV.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQI.L.

What is the main difference between FGQI.L and TDIV.L?

FGQI.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while TDIV.L is Global Equities. FGQI.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income Index, while TDIV.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQI.L and 0.38% for TDIV.L.