PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGQI.L is traded in USD, while ISPA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ISPA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQI.L achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 14.74% return.


FGQI.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.70%
6M
9.05%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*

ISPA.DE

1D
0.96%
1M
1.36%
6M
12.56%
YTD
14.74%
1Y
30.73%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQI.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD
11.13%20.08%11.79%17.99%-10.78%22.22%10.14%27.77%-7.59%16.89%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
14.74%35.16%6.51%8.10%-7.32%13.12%-0.24%21.61%-11.35%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQI.L and ISPA.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FGQI.L and ISPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQI.L
FGQI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGQI.LISPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

5.68

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

17.94

-5.97

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQI.L and ISPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQI.L drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQI.L and ISPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQI.LISPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-40.27%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-5.39%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.79%

-13.69%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.11%

-25.57%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-5.91%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.71%

+0.25%

Volatility

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQI.LISPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.71%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

8.40%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

10.83%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

14.39%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

16.04%

-0.36%

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQI.L vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

FGQI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than ISPA.DE's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGQI.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD
1.78%1.81%2.32%2.71%2.77%2.52%2.45%2.34%2.78%1.50%0.00%0.00%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.94%4.52%4.89%5.91%4.87%3.31%4.04%4.02%4.01%5.66%3.64%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQI.L and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FGQI.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGQI.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

FGQI.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while ISPA.DE is Global Equities. FGQI.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income Index, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQI.L and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQI.L and ISPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer