PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGQD.L is traded in GBp, while LYPS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYPS.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGQD.L having a 10.28% return and LYPS.DE slightly higher at 10.55%.


FGQD.L

1D
0.18%
1M
4.38%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.17%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*

LYPS.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.43%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.38%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
16.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
10.28%11.78%13.21%11.51%-0.25%23.78%6.42%23.83%-2.30%7.82%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
10.55%10.35%26.75%20.24%-9.39%30.98%13.11%27.93%0.37%7.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and LYPS.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.77

The correlation between FGQD.L and LYPS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGQD.LLYPS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.48

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

4.10

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.82

14.81

+2.01

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and LYPS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGQD.LLYPS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

2.61

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.01

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.00

-0.14

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, roughly equal to the maximum LYPS.DE drawdown of -26.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and LYPS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQD.LLYPS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-26.41%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.06%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-22.07%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-22.07%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-3.28%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.96%

-0.37%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) is 1.88%, while Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that FGQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYPS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQD.LLYPS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

3.01%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

7.43%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

11.12%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

14.77%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.99%

-1.38%

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LYPS.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQD.L vs. LYPS.DE - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than LYPS.DE's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
1.81%1.87%2.31%2.78%2.69%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.56%0.00%0.00%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.90%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQD.L and LYPS.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

FGQD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LYPS.DE is S&P 500. FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.07% for LYPS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQD.L and LYPS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer