PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQD.L vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGQD.L is traded in GBp, while IAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQD.L achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 0.55% return.


FGQD.L

1D
0.92%
1M
2.70%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.84%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*

IAU

1D
2.54%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
0.55%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
10.74%12.15%13.21%11.51%-0.25%23.78%6.42%23.83%-2.25%-14.04%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.55%52.27%29.07%7.20%11.18%-3.09%21.36%13.49%4.07%-3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and IAU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGQD.LIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

1.16

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.00

3.42

+13.58

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -41.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQD.LIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-41.56%

+15.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-23.32%

+16.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-23.32%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-23.32%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.10%

+19.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-13.05%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

7.92%

-6.31%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) is 3.04%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that FGQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQD.LIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

7.60%

-4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

22.57%

-15.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

25.93%

-16.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.22%

16.90%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.28%

-0.82%

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQD.L vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
1.80%1.86%2.31%2.78%2.70%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.10%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQD.L and IAU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

FGQD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IAU is Gold. FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.25% for IAU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQD.L and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer