FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) and BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - FGQD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while BOTG.L is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FGQD.L returned 14.75%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for BOTG.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGQD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BOTG.L.

Performance

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FGQD.L is traded in GBp, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQD.L achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's 9.21% return.

FGQD.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: —

BOTG.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 9.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	10.28%	11.78%	13.21%	11.51%	-0.25%	2.29%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	9.21%	5.46%	14.97%	32.61%	-36.00%	-6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and BOTG.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021	0.58

The correlation between FGQD.L and BOTG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGQD.L	BOTG.L
Technology	30.7%	39.5%
Financial Services	15.9%	0.8%
Industrials	11.7%	48.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	0.8%
Communication Services	8.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.9%	0.5%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.3%
Utilities	2.5%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L

FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGQD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	1.05	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	1.65	+2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.22	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	1.83	+2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.82	5.12	+11.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGQD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	1.05	+1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.04	+0.82

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and BOTG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGQD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.43%	-43.70%	+17.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-15.67%	+8.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	-30.90%	+14.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.43%	+7.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-19.30%	+16.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	5.60%	-4.01%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) is 1.88%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that FGQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGQD.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	12.02%	-10.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.37%	19.88%	-13.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.89%	27.30%	-18.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.07%	28.40%	-16.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.61%	28.40%	-13.79%

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGQD.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than BOTG.L's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.22%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	1.81%	1.87%	2.31%	2.78%	2.69%	2.46%	2.60%	2.44%	2.70%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGQD.L and BOTG.L in my portfolio?

FGQD.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FGQD.L or BOTG.L?

On fees, FGQD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGQD.L or BOTG.L?

FGQD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTG.L.

What is the main difference between FGQD.L and BOTG.L?

FGQD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BOTG.L is Robotics. FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.50% for BOTG.L.