FGM vs. PBEU
FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGM is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while PBEU is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BITA European Banks Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBEU.
Performance
FGM vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 11.85% return.
FGM
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
PBEU
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGM vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 1.69% | 10.52% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 11.85% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGM and PBEU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGM vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank
FGM
PBEU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FGM vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGM | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGM vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and PBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGM | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -17.26% | -34.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.60% | -2.96% | -6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -3.94% | -10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | — | — |
Volatility
FGM vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGM | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.91% | 27.63% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 27.63% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 27.63% | -4.72% |
FGM vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGM vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison
FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.65% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGM and PBEU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBEU is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBEU is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
FGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
FGM is categorized as Europe Equities, while PBEU is Financials Equities. FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.13% for PBEU.
Find the right allocation for FGM and PBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer