FGM vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
FGM is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012.
Performance
FGM vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGM vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | -1.81% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -25.14% | 44.28% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | -5.76% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 7.67%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.75% annualized return.
FGM
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 33.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.67%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -5.76%
- 6M
- -6.13%
- 1Y
- 59.59%
- 3Y*
- 85.01%
- 5Y*
- 66.40%
- 10Y*
- 69.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGM vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
FGM
NVDA
FGM vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.14 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.08 | -1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 7.73 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 1.29 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 1.40 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGM and NVDA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGM vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.68% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
FGM vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and NVDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -89.72% | +38.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -20.21% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.07% | -66.34% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.58% | -66.34% | +14.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.71% | -15.10% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -36.40% | +21.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 8.05% | -3.35% |
Volatility
FGM vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) is 9.39%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that FGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 10.43% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.97% | 25.79% | -10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.69% | 41.42% | -18.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 51.72% | -27.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 49.84% | -26.89% |