FGM vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGM is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGM returned 4.13%/yr vs -11.24%/yr for KTEC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

FGM vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -16.16% return.

FGM

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 17.41%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: 8.76%

KTEC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -11.70%
• YTD: -16.16%
• 6M: -17.79%
• 1Y: -16.98%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: -11.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGM vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	3.19%	63.60%	1.36%	13.28%	-30.46%	-9.70%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-16.16%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and KTEC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.41

FGM vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGM	KTEC
Industrials	40.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	16.6%	48.6%
Real Estate	10.8%	-
Basic Materials	9.0%	-
Financial Services	8.2%	-
Healthcare	6.4%	2.5%
Communication Services	3.2%	27.6%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	-
Energy	-	-
Technology	-	21.3%

Return for Risk

FGM vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGM

FGM Risk / Return Rank: 25
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGM vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGM	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	-0.61	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	-0.75	+2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.92	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	-0.56	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	-1.00	+4.01

FGM vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGM vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGM	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	-66.90%	+15.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.76%	-30.47%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.93%	-34.71%	+16.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.45%	-66.90%	+16.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.26%	-47.09%	+38.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.72%	-43.95%	+29.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.81%	16.97%	-11.16%

Volatility

FGM vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) is 6.75%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that FGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGM	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	9.07%	-2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	20.61%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.94%	28.01%	-7.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	43.16%	-18.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.11%	43.11%	-20.00%

FGM vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGM vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than KTEC's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	0.64%	0.66%	2.56%	2.82%	5.44%	1.43%	1.33%	2.30%	2.18%	2.11%	1.33%	1.13%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.00%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGM and KTEC in my portfolio?

FGM and KTEC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGM or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to FGM (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, FGM or KTEC?

On 5-year performance, FGM leads with 4.13% vs -11.24% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGM or KTEC?

Over the 5-year period, FGM has performed better with a 4.13% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGM or KTEC?

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGM or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.

What is the main difference between FGM and KTEC?

FGM is categorized as Europe Equities, while KTEC is China Equities. FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.