PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGM vs. FLEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGM vs. FLEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLEU's 7.23% return.


FGM

1D
0.14%
1M
0.55%
YTD
4.27%
6M
8.73%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
8.07%

FLEU

1D
0.91%
1M
1.11%
YTD
7.23%
6M
10.09%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGM vs. FLEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
4.27%63.60%1.36%13.28%-30.46%6.10%17.26%20.77%-25.14%3.69%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
7.23%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and FLEU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.69

The correlation between FGM and FLEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGM vs. FLEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGM
FLEU

Industrials

40.5%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

16.6%
8.4%

Real Estate

10.8%
1.2%

Basic Materials

9.0%
4.3%

Financial Services

8.2%
24.8%

Healthcare

6.4%
5.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.6%

Utilities

3.2%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
5.2%

Energy

-

4.0%

Technology

-

14.7%

Industrials

FGM
40.5%
FLEU
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FGM
16.6%
FLEU
8.4%

Real Estate

FGM
10.8%
FLEU
1.2%

Basic Materials

FGM
9.0%
FLEU
4.3%

Financial Services

FGM
8.2%
FLEU
24.8%

Healthcare

FGM
6.4%
FLEU
5.8%

Communication Services

FGM
3.2%
FLEU
3.6%

Utilities

FGM
3.2%
FLEU
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

FGM
2.2%
FLEU
5.2%

Energy

FGM

-

FLEU
4.0%

Technology

FGM

-

FLEU
14.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGM vs. FLEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGM
FGM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGM vs. FLEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGMFLEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.41

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

5.14

-1.72

FGM vs. FLEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the FLEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and FLEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGMFLEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.11

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.74

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.57

-0.23

Drawdowns

FGM vs. FLEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than FLEU's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and FLEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGMFLEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.58%

-33.94%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-13.41%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-15.67%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.07%

-18.67%

-32.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-0.61%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-4.71%

-10.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

3.68%

+1.93%

Volatility

FGM vs. FLEU - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) at 5.07%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGMFLEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

5.07%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

14.39%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

17.03%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

16.34%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

18.25%

+4.85%

FGM vs. FLEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEU's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGM vs. FLEU - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FLEU's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
0.64%0.66%2.56%2.82%5.44%1.43%1.33%2.30%2.18%2.11%1.33%1.13%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.07%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGM and FLEU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGM has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to FLEU (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs FLEU's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 12.01% vs 4.22% for FGM. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

FLEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.

FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.09% for FLEU.

FLEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGM and FLEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer