FGM vs. EUSC
FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and EUSC (WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - FGM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index while EUSC tracks the WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for EUSC.
Performance
FGM vs. EUSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGM
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
EUSC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGM vs. EUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | -2.90% |
EUSC WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 0.00% |
FGM vs. EUSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGM
EUSC
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
-
Industrials
FGM
EUSC
Consumer Cyclical
FGM
EUSC
Real Estate
FGM
EUSC
Basic Materials
FGM
EUSC
Financial Services
FGM
EUSC
Healthcare
FGM
EUSC
Communication Services
FGM
EUSC
Utilities
FGM
EUSC
Consumer Defensive
FGM
EUSC
Energy
FGM
-
EUSC
Technology
FGM
-
EUSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGM vs. EUSC — Risk / Return Rank
FGM
EUSC
FGM vs. EUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (EUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGM | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGM | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FGM vs. EUSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than EUSC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and EUSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGM | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | 0.00% | -51.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | 0.00% | -7.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.74% | 0.00% | -14.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | — | — |
Volatility
FGM vs. EUSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGM | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 0.00% | +20.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 0.00% | +24.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 0.00% | +23.11% |
FGM vs. EUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGM vs. EUSC - Dividend Comparison
FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while EUSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSC WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EUSC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUSC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
FGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for EUSC.
FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while EUSC tracks WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.58% for EUSC.
Find the right allocation for FGM and EUSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer