PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGM vs. DBEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGM vs. DBEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBEU's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed DBEU with an annualized return of 8.09%, while DBEU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


FGM

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.88%
YTD
4.13%
6M
9.75%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
8.09%

DBEU

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.69%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGM vs. DBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
4.13%63.60%1.36%13.28%-30.46%6.10%17.26%20.77%-25.14%44.28%
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
7.52%22.18%9.17%17.43%-6.25%23.99%-1.42%27.32%-8.49%14.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and DBEU is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.70

The correlation between FGM and DBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGM vs. DBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGM
DBEU

Industrials

40.5%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

10.8%
0.8%

Basic Materials

9.0%
5.6%

Financial Services

8.2%
23.2%

Healthcare

6.4%
13.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.7%

Utilities

3.2%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
8.7%

Energy

-

5.4%

Technology

-

8.5%

Industrials

FGM
40.5%
DBEU
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FGM
16.6%
DBEU
6.3%

Real Estate

FGM
10.8%
DBEU
0.8%

Basic Materials

FGM
9.0%
DBEU
5.6%

Financial Services

FGM
8.2%
DBEU
23.2%

Healthcare

FGM
6.4%
DBEU
13.0%

Communication Services

FGM
3.2%
DBEU
3.7%

Utilities

FGM
3.2%
DBEU
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

FGM
2.2%
DBEU
8.7%

Energy

FGM

-

DBEU
5.4%

Technology

FGM

-

DBEU
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGM vs. DBEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGM
FGM Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEU
DBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGM vs. DBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGMDBEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

1.41

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

2.01

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.82

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.48

7.27

-3.79

FGM vs. DBEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the DBEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and DBEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGMDBEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.41

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.79

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.67

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.58

-0.23

Drawdowns

FGM vs. DBEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than DBEU's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and DBEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGMDBEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.58%

-34.50%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-9.81%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-15.35%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.07%

-17.67%

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.58%

-34.50%

-17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-1.49%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-4.44%

-10.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

2.45%

+3.14%

Volatility

FGM vs. DBEU - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) at 4.71%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGMDBEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

4.71%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

10.50%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

12.70%

+7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

14.32%

+10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

16.46%

+6.65%

FGM vs. DBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEU's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGM vs. DBEU - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than DBEU's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
4.23%4.55%0.07%3.64%1.96%1.87%2.44%2.77%3.55%2.28%9.92%5.50%
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
0.64%0.66%2.56%2.82%5.44%1.43%1.33%2.30%2.18%2.11%1.33%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGM and DBEU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to DBEU (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs DBEU's -34.50%.

On 10-year performance, DBEU leads with 11.01% vs 8.09% for FGM. On fees, DBEU is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEU has performed better with a 11.01% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEU is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

DBEU has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.

FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while DBEU tracks MSCI Europe US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.45% for DBEU.

DBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGM and DBEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer