FGM vs. BBEU
FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and BBEU (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FGM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index while BBEU tracks the Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGM returned 4.22%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for BBEU. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBEU.
Performance
FGM vs. BBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than BBEU's 6.77% return.
FGM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
BBEU
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FGM vs. BBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 4.27% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -22.75% |
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | 6.77% | 36.37% | 1.85% | 20.31% | -14.72% | 17.50% | 5.00% | 23.96% | -13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGM and BBEU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FGM and BBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGM vs. BBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGM
BBEU
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
-
Industrials
FGM
BBEU
Consumer Cyclical
FGM
BBEU
Real Estate
FGM
BBEU
Basic Materials
FGM
BBEU
Financial Services
FGM
BBEU
Healthcare
FGM
BBEU
Communication Services
FGM
BBEU
Utilities
FGM
BBEU
Consumer Defensive
FGM
BBEU
Energy
FGM
-
BBEU
Technology
FGM
-
BBEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGM vs. BBEU — Risk / Return Rank
FGM
BBEU
FGM vs. BBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGM | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.56 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 5.78 | -2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGM | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.52 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.48 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FGM vs. BBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than BBEU's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and BBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGM | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -36.27% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -12.23% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -14.23% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.07% | -31.08% | -19.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -1.50% | -5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -6.14% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 3.29% | +2.32% |
Volatility
FGM vs. BBEU - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) at 5.55%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGM | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 5.55% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 13.02% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 15.51% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 17.50% | +6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 19.32% | +3.78% |
FGM vs. BBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGM vs. BBEU - Dividend Comparison
FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than BBEU's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | 2.78% | 2.83% | 4.16% | 2.94% | 4.72% | 2.63% | 2.29% | 3.24% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGM and BBEU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGM has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to BBEU (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs BBEU's -36.27%.
On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 9.03% vs 4.22% for FGM. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.
FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.09% for BBEU.
BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGM and BBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer