FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY
FGLS.NEO (Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGLS.NEO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. FGLS.NEO is actively managed, while FUTY is passively managed. Over the past year, FGLS.NEO returned 3.00% vs 20.56% for FUTY. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. FGLS.NEO charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FGLS.NEO is traded in CAD, while FUTY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FUTY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGLS.NEO achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FUTY's 12.39% return.
FGLS.NEO
- 1D
- 5.54%
- 1M
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 20.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FGLS.NEO Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF | 0.47% | 8.38% | -21.20% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 12.39% | 11.09% | 36.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGLS.NEO and FUTY is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
FGLS.NEO
FUTY
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF (FGLS.NEO) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGLS.NEO | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.23 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 1.98 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 4.30 | -4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGLS.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.89%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLS.NEO and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGLS.NEO | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -30.56% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.12% | -10.42% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.30% | -0.77% | -13.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -5.69% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.07% | 4.79% | +5.28% |
Volatility
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF (FGLS.NEO) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) at 4.81%. This indicates that FGLS.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGLS.NEO | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 4.81% | +6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 12.29% | +7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.20% | 15.40% | +10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 18.22% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 20.21% | +3.30% |
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGLS.NEO has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGLS.NEO vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
FGLS.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGLS.NEO Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.56% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGLS.NEO and FUTY have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for FGLS.NEO.
FGLS.NEO is categorized as Long-Short, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for FGLS.NEO and 0.08% for FUTY.
Find the right allocation for FGLS.NEO and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer