PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLR.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGLR.DE achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.


FGLR.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
4.17%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.09%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*

XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.86%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGLR.DE
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc
9.94%5.43%24.62%20.29%-14.52%32.48%11.79%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%24.01%-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLR.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FGLR.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLR.DE
FGLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FGLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLR.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGLR.DEXDEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.00

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

-0.02

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

-0.03

+11.77

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLR.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGLR.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

-0.01

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.61

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.70

+0.27

Drawdowns

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.DE drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLR.DE and XDEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLR.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.47%

-28.57%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-5.31%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.47%

-13.02%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-13.02%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-6.53%

+6.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-5.03%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.37%

-0.50%

Volatility

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLR.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) have volatilities of 2.51% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGLR.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.63%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

5.56%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

7.86%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

10.16%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

12.03%

+2.36%

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLR.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGLR.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGLR.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FGLR.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FGLR.DE.

FGLR.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FGLR.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGLR.DE and XDEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer