PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLGX vs. SSSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class K (SSSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGLGX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than SSSYX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FGLGX has outperformed SSSYX with an annualized return of 16.45%, while SSSYX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.


FGLGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.30%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.09%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
16.45%

SSSYX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.73%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
10.11%28.57%27.45%24.80%-7.23%26.53%10.01%32.37%-8.95%16.64%
SSSYX
State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class K
11.69%17.81%24.99%26.27%-18.16%28.51%18.31%31.38%-4.38%21.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLGX and SSSYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.92

The correlation between FGLGX and SSSYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGLGX vs. SSSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLGX
FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SSSYX
SSSYX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SSSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SSSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class K (SSSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGLGXSSSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.36

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

15.69

+0.34

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the SSSYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLGX and SSSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGLGXSSSYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.52

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.85

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.13

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.12

+0.76

Drawdowns

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLGX drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum SSSYX drawdown of -91.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLGX and SSSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLGXSSSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.42%

-91.48%

+55.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-8.88%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-18.74%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-24.49%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-91.48%

+55.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-4.15%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.90%

+0.16%

Volatility

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class K (SSSYX) have volatilities of 2.89% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGLGXSSSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.82%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

8.96%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

11.85%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

16.88%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

124.46%

-106.09%

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLGX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SSSYX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FGLGX vs. SSSYX - Dividend Comparison

FGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than SSSYX's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
8.94%9.84%7.99%5.29%6.55%9.22%5.36%7.25%12.29%4.61%1.69%5.94%
SSSYX
State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class K
1.29%1.44%1.63%1.78%2.16%2.76%1.86%4.44%5.18%5.94%2.07%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FGLGX and SSSYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGLGX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to SSSYX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGLGX dropped -36.42% vs SSSYX's -91.48%.

FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGLGX and SSSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer