FGIYX vs. RGSVX
FGIYX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund) and RGSVX (ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FGIYX returned 9.84%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for RGSVX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGIYX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RGSVX.
Performance
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGIYX having a 11.86% return and RGSVX slightly higher at 12.37%.
FGIYX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.51%
RGSVX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund | 11.86% | 18.08% | 10.91% | 8.90% | -6.10% | 14.85% | -2.55% | 36.57% | -7.70% | 19.64% |
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 12.37% | 26.02% | 2.19% | 3.64% | -5.85% | 12.09% | 12.33% | 26.21% | -7.94% | 17.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIYX and RGSVX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FGIYX and RGSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGIYX vs. RGSVX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIYX
RGSVX
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGIYX | RGSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.07 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 8.62 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIYX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, which is greater than RGSVX's maximum drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIYX and RGSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIYX | RGSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.18% | -35.19% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -6.49% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -12.38% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -24.50% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -3.47% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -5.58% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.31% | -0.38% |
Volatility
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) at 2.90%. This indicates that FGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGIYX | RGSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.90% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 9.77% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.66% | 11.46% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 14.05% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 15.57% | -0.28% |
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RGSVX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGIYX vs. RGSVX - Dividend Comparison
FGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.86%, more than RGSVX's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund | 14.86% | 10.28% | 7.74% | 2.51% | 6.41% | 7.48% | 1.62% | 12.32% | 6.62% | 6.10% | 8.64% | 3.31% |
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 3.23% | 3.00% | 4.04% | 4.78% | 4.90% | 4.65% | 3.79% | 2.99% | 2.79% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FGIYX and RGSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FGIYX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to RGSVX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIYX dropped -49.18% vs RGSVX's -35.19%.
RGSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGIYX and RGSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer