FGIYX vs. JQC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FGIYX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund) and JQC (Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FGIYX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Nuveen, while JQC is a Bank Loan fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, FGIYX returned 9.06%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for JQC. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FGIYX charges 0.97%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for JQC.

Performance

FGIYX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGIYX achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIYX has outperformed JQC with an annualized return of 9.06%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.

FGIYX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.92%
• 6M: 7.30%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 1Y: 15.79%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 9.06%
• ALL TIME*: 7.51%

JQC

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.01%
• 6M: -0.84%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 1Y: -1.75%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 4.66%
• 10Y*: 5.49%
• ALL TIME*: 4.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund	$2.47M	$2.59M	$2.73M

FGIYX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	11.86%	18.08%	10.91%	8.90%	-6.10%	14.85%	-2.55%	36.57%	-7.70%	19.64%
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund	2.40%	-0.36%	22.29%	15.26%	-14.22%	13.29%	-2.96%	21.78%	-4.33%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FGIYX and JQC is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between FGIYX and JQC has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGIYX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGIYX

FGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

JQC

JQC Risk / Return Rank: 3
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGIYX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGIYX	JQC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	-0.16	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	-0.15	+2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.98	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	-0.17	+2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	-0.33	+8.69

FGIYX vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIYX and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGIYX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIYX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIYX and JQC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGIYX	JQC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.18%	-75.18%	+26.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-10.15%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	-15.37%	+5.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-19.83%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.06%	-47.99%	+9.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-3.76%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-8.78%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	5.32%	-3.39%

Volatility

FGIYX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 1.49%. This indicates that FGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGIYX	JQC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	1.49%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.01%	8.51%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.66%	11.15%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.22%	13.07%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	17.49%	-2.20%

FGIYX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGIYX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

FGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.86%, more than JQC's 13.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	14.86%	10.28%	7.74%	2.51%	6.41%	7.48%	1.62%	12.32%	6.62%	6.10%	8.64%	3.31%
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund	13.09%	12.91%	11.39%	11.42%	9.71%	10.03%	16.11%	16.14%	6.53%	7.42%	6.99%	7.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGIYX and JQC in my portfolio?

FGIYX and JQC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGIYX or JQC?

FGIYX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to JQC (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIYX dropped -49.18% vs JQC's -75.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.