FGIYX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
FGIYX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 16, 2007. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.48% | 18.08% | 10.91% | 8.90% | -6.10% | 14.85% | -2.55% | 36.57% | -7.70% | 19.64% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIYX achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIYX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.
FGIYX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIYX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIYX
CSUIX
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 1.67 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 2.21 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.42 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 10.58 | +1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.67 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.64 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIYX and CSUIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
FGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, more than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.39% | 10.28% | 7.74% | 2.51% | 6.41% | 7.48% | 1.62% | 12.32% | 6.62% | 6.10% | 8.64% | 3.31% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIYX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIYX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.18% | -52.01% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -7.99% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -20.01% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.06% | -35.01% | -3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -4.36% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -8.21% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.82% | -0.04% |
Volatility
FGIYX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.24% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 6.90% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 11.49% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 12.86% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 14.88% | +0.43% |