FGILX vs. UCEQX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FGILX (Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund) and UCEQX (USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGILX returned 12.08%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for UCEQX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGILX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for UCEQX.

Performance

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGILX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 14.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGILX having a 12.08% annualized return and UCEQX not far behind at 11.50%.

FGILX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 6.99%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 19.97%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

UCEQX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 11.11%
• YTD: 14.40%
• 1Y: 26.65%
• 3Y*: 20.48%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund	10.13%	25.99%	13.80%	15.33%	-11.93%	19.05%	14.49%	30.20%	-10.93%	21.68%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	14.40%	23.71%	14.50%	19.36%	-16.25%	19.68%	10.76%	22.49%	-12.06%	22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FGILX and UCEQX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2012	0.94

The correlation between FGILX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGILX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGILX

FGILX Risk / Return Rank: 56
FGILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FGILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FGILX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FGILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FGILX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

UCEQX

UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 78
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGILX	UCEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.98	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.73	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.36	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	2.90	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	12.53	-2.94

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGILX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGILX drawdown since its inception was -30.59%, smaller than the maximum UCEQX drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGILX and UCEQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGILX	UCEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.59%	-35.33%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.69%	-8.96%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-15.64%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.40%	-25.24%	+3.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.59%	-35.33%	+4.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-0.21%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-4.84%	+1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.07%	-0.05%

Volatility

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) is 3.77%, while USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that FGILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGILX	UCEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	4.65%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	10.88%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	13.12%	-1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.63%	15.39%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	16.44%	-1.98%

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGILX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGILX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

FGILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than UCEQX's 4.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund	1.52%	2.06%	2.38%	1.25%	1.21%	11.94%	3.17%	1.51%	6.23%	2.10%	1.27%	2.75%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	4.44%	5.08%	2.56%	5.10%	6.80%	4.61%	8.25%	4.79%	6.73%	1.91%	3.16%	3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGILX and UCEQX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FGILX and UCEQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGILX or UCEQX?

UCEQX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FGILX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGILX dropped -30.59% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.