PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGIKX vs. SMVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGIKX achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly lower than SMVLX's 21.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIKX has outperformed SMVLX with an annualized return of 14.03%, while SMVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.


FGIKX

1D
1.60%
1M
2.54%
6M
9.10%
YTD
12.83%
1Y
19.30%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
14.03%
ALL TIME*
9.49%

SMVLX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.62%
6M
15.19%
YTD
21.61%
1Y
31.03%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
12.62%
ALL TIME*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGIKX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K
12.83%19.16%19.57%18.75%-4.88%25.95%8.09%30.39%-8.88%17.03%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
21.61%5.05%4.78%16.87%-2.79%42.46%1.71%26.29%-4.79%19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FGIKX and SMVLX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FGIKX and SMVLX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGIKX vs. SMVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGIKX
FGIKX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FGIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SMVLX
SMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGIKXSMVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

5.49

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

16.36

-6.02

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SMVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIKX and SMVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIKX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, which is greater than SMVLX's maximum drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIKX and SMVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGIKXSMVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.07%

-39.56%

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-5.90%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-24.62%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-24.62%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-39.56%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-4.56%

-6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.97%

+0.02%

Volatility

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) at 2.98%. This indicates that FGIKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGIKXSMVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.98%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

8.36%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

13.50%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

18.27%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

19.43%

-2.04%

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIKX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SMVLX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGIKX vs. SMVLX - Dividend Comparison

FGIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than SMVLX's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIKX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K
6.59%7.74%4.66%4.03%3.52%6.11%3.71%2.94%3.51%1.63%1.92%2.23%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
1.37%1.67%1.08%1.34%1.78%3.91%1.40%3.83%7.47%0.22%3.14%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGIKX and SMVLX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGIKX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to SMVLX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIKX dropped -62.07% vs SMVLX's -39.56%.

SMVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGIKX and SMVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer