PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGIKX vs. FGRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGIKX having a 7.66% return and FGRIX slightly lower at 7.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGIKX having a 13.95% annualized return and FGRIX not far ahead at 14.33%.


FGIKX

1D
-0.01%
1M
2.59%
YTD
7.66%
6M
6.97%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
13.95%

FGRIX

1D
-0.01%
1M
2.58%
YTD
7.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
14.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGIKX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K
7.66%19.16%19.57%18.75%-4.88%25.95%8.09%30.39%-8.88%17.03%
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
7.63%21.59%22.10%18.63%-4.98%25.84%7.98%30.22%-8.94%16.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FGIKX and FGRIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

1.00

The correlation between FGIKX and FGRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGIKX vs. FGRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGIKX
FGIKX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FGIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRIX
FGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGIKXFGRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.89

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

12.11

-1.34

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIKX and FGRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGIKXFGRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.27

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.88

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Drawdowns

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIKX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, smaller than the maximum FGRIX drawdown of -67.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIKX and FGRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGIKXFGRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.07%

-67.10%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-8.35%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-16.42%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-19.26%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-35.63%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.01%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-10.12%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.99%

+0.02%

Volatility

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) have volatilities of 2.38% and 2.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGIKXFGRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

2.36%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

7.97%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

10.64%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

15.52%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

17.45%

+0.04%

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIKX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGIKX vs. FGRIX - Dividend Comparison

FGIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, less than FGRIX's 9.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIKX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K
7.21%7.74%4.66%4.03%3.52%6.11%3.71%2.94%3.51%1.63%1.92%2.23%
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
9.10%9.78%6.80%3.93%3.43%6.02%3.61%2.85%3.39%1.52%1.80%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FGIKX and FGRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGIKX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to FGRIX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIKX dropped -62.07% vs FGRIX's -67.10%.

FGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGIKX and FGRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer