FGIKX vs. NEIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX).
FGIKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003.
Performance
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIKX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K | -0.45% | 19.16% | 19.57% | 18.75% | -4.88% | 25.95% | 8.09% | 30.39% | -8.88% | 17.03% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 5.61% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 23.49% | -9.76% | 19.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIKX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIKX has outperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 13.44%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.
FGIKX
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
NEIMX
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIKX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIKX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIKX
NEIMX
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.65 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 2.32 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 2.49 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 12.55 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.65 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.02 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.02 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.03 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIKX and NEIMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison
FGIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than NEIMX's 0.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIKX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K | 7.78% | 7.74% | 4.66% | 4.03% | 3.52% | 6.11% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 3.51% | 1.63% | 1.92% | 2.23% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.72% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIKX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIKX and NEIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.07% | -92.94% | +30.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -10.78% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -92.94% | +73.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -92.94% | +57.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -90.08% | +84.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -9.92% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.14% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FGIKX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio Class K (FGIKX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FGIKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 4.05% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 8.52% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 15.65% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 576.30% | -560.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 407.62% | -390.11% |