FGHMX vs. FGEMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGHMX (Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C) and FGEMX (Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class M) are both Communications Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FGHMX returned 11.77%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for FGEMX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FGHMX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for FGEMX.

Performance

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class M (FGEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGHMX having a 5.72% return and FGEMX slightly higher at 5.97%.

FGHMX

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: 30.68%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: —

FGEMX

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -4.17%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: 31.37%
• 5Y*: 12.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C	5.72%	34.91%	34.57%	55.30%	-38.91%	14.78%	34.11%	31.72%	-7.48%
FGEMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class M	5.97%	35.78%	35.16%	56.03%	-38.63%	15.37%	34.73%	32.42%	-7.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FGHMX and FGEMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018	1.00

The correlation between FGHMX and FGEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGHMX vs. FGEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGHMX

FGHMX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FGHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FGHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FGHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FGHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FGHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FGEMX

FGEMX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FGEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FGEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FGEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FGEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FGEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class M (FGEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGHMX	FGEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.60	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.21	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.84	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	6.73	-0.18

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGHMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the FGEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGHMX and FGEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGHMX drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FGEMX drawdown of -47.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGHMX and FGEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGHMX	FGEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.03%	-47.74%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.05%	-16.98%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-23.26%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.03%	-47.74%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.41%	-6.38%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.14%	-10.93%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	4.64%	+0.03%

Volatility

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class M (FGEMX) have volatilities of 6.59% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGHMX	FGEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	6.59%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	14.91%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.58%	19.57%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	23.37%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.95%	23.95%	0.00%

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGHMX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FGEMX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGHMX vs. FGEMX - Dividend Comparison

FGHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than FGEMX's 12.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGEMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class M	12.51%	7.28%	6.99%	0.00%	0.00%	5.61%	3.78%	35.33%	8.81%
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C	12.81%	7.17%	7.20%	0.00%	0.00%	5.54%	3.81%	35.35%	8.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGHMX and FGEMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FGHMX and FGEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGHMX or FGEMX?

FGEMX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FGHMX (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGHMX dropped -48.03% vs FGEMX's -47.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.