PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGFPP vs. PMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FGFPP vs. PMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FG Financial Group, Inc. (FGFPP) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGFPP achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than PMT's -17.41% return.


FGFPP

1D
4.35%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
16.66%
6M
22.45%
1Y
58.04%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*

PMT

1D
-3.93%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
-17.41%
6M
-17.04%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-1.60%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGFPP vs. PMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGFPP
FG Financial Group, Inc.
16.66%54.74%11.25%-11.55%-8.20%11.23%-4.96%52.31%-16.49%
PMT
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
-17.41%13.23%-5.38%36.11%-18.07%8.47%-12.99%30.33%23.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FGFPP and PMT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FGFPP:

$159.17M

PMT:

$872.56M

EPS

FGFPP:

-$32.42

PMT:

$1.52

PS Ratio

FGFPP:

13.00

PMT:

0.82

PB Ratio

FGFPP:

1.75

PMT:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

FGFPP:

$5.49M

PMT:

$1.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FGFPP:

$5.19M

PMT:

$946.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

FGFPP:

-$98.86M

PMT:

$966.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGFPP vs. PMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGFPP
FGFPP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FGFPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGFPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGFPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FGFPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGFPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PMT
PMT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGFPP vs. PMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FG Financial Group, Inc. (FGFPP) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGFPPPMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.97

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

-0.28

+3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

-0.73

+9.36

FGFPP vs. PMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGFPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the PMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGFPP and PMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGFPPPMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

-0.26

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.05

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.18

+0.06

Drawdowns

FGFPP vs. PMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGFPP drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum PMT drawdown of -75.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGFPP and PMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGFPPPMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-75.90%

+31.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-24.94%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-24.94%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.29%

-39.81%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-24.94%

+19.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.42%

-11.56%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

9.40%

-2.65%

Volatility

FGFPP vs. PMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FG Financial Group, Inc. (FGFPP) is 10.60%, while PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) has a volatility of 11.18%. This indicates that FGFPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGFPPPMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

11.18%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.40%

21.88%

+8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.78%

26.43%

+19.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.27%

29.56%

+18.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.82%

45.18%

-4.36%

Dividends

FGFPP vs. PMT - Dividend Comparison

FGFPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than PMT's 15.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGFPP
FG Financial Group, Inc.
8.33%9.32%12.94%12.79%9.95%8.20%8.41%7.38%8.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PMT
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
15.97%12.75%12.71%10.70%14.61%10.85%8.64%8.43%10.10%11.70%11.48%14.15%

Financials

FGFPP vs. PMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FG Financial Group, Inc. and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M0.00200.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
232.00K
3.37M
(FGFPP) Total Revenue
(PMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FGFPP and PMT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMT has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to FGFPP (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGFPP dropped -44.29% vs PMT's -75.90%.

FGFPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGFPP and PMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer