PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGFPP vs. DX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FGFPP vs. DX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FG Financial Group, Inc. (FGFPP) and Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGFPP achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than DX's -1.54% return.


FGFPP

1D
4.35%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
16.66%
6M
22.45%
1Y
58.04%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*

DX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGFPP vs. DX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGFPP
FG Financial Group, Inc.
16.66%54.74%11.25%-11.55%-8.20%11.23%-4.96%52.31%-16.49%
DX
Dynex Capital, Inc.
-1.54%29.48%13.64%11.91%-15.39%2.25%17.09%11.12%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FGFPP and DX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FGFPP:

$159.17M

DX:

$2.56B

EPS

FGFPP:

-$32.42

DX:

$1.59

PS Ratio

FGFPP:

13.00

DX:

2.79

PB Ratio

FGFPP:

1.75

DX:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

FGFPP:

$5.49M

DX:

$695.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FGFPP:

$5.19M

DX:

$695.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

FGFPP:

-$98.86M

DX:

$900.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FG Financial Group, Inc.

Dynex Capital, Inc.

Return for Risk

FGFPP vs. DX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGFPP
FGFPP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FGFPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGFPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGFPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FGFPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGFPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DX
DX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGFPP vs. DX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FG Financial Group, Inc. (FGFPP) and Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGFPPDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.42

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

1.99

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.61

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.62

5.12

+3.51

FGFPP vs. DX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGFPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the DX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGFPP and DX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGFPPDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.42

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.17

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.17

+0.07

Drawdowns

FGFPP vs. DX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGFPP drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum DX drawdown of -99.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGFPP and DX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGFPPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-99.12%

+54.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-15.27%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-25.81%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.29%

-38.69%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-32.61%

+27.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.42%

-56.81%

+46.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

4.80%

+1.95%

Volatility

FGFPP vs. DX - Volatility Comparison

FG Financial Group, Inc. (FGFPP) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX) at 4.07%. This indicates that FGFPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGFPPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

4.07%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.40%

13.45%

+16.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.78%

17.41%

+28.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.27%

23.85%

+24.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.82%

29.88%

+10.94%

Dividends

FGFPP vs. DX - Dividend Comparison

FGFPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than DX's 15.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DX
Dynex Capital, Inc.
15.95%14.13%11.46%12.46%12.26%9.34%9.33%11.87%12.59%10.27%12.32%15.12%
FGFPP
FG Financial Group, Inc.
8.33%9.32%12.94%12.79%9.95%8.20%8.41%7.38%8.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FGFPP vs. DX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FG Financial Group, Inc. and Dynex Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
232.00K
257.39M
(FGFPP) Total Revenue
(DX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FGFPP and DX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGFPP has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to DX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGFPP dropped -44.29% vs DX's -99.12%.

DX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGFPP and DX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer