FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FGEP.TO (Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF) and CGRA.TO (CI Global Real Asset Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - FGEP.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while CGRA.TO is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FGEP.TO returned 31.07% vs 17.95% for CGRA.TO. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FGEP.TO charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for CGRA.TO.

Performance

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO) and CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGEP.TO achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly higher than CGRA.TO's 16.82% return.

FGEP.TO

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 16.06%
• YTD: 20.73%
• 1Y: 31.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.43%

CGRA.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 13.33%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 12.41%
• 5Y*: 7.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool	CA$2.41K	CA$22.41K	CA$23.52K
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF	CA$1.06M	CA$1.09M	CA$1.04M

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF	20.73%	17.44%	9.88%
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool	16.82%	7.16%	8.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FGEP.TO and CGRA.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024	0.13

Return for Risk

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGEP.TO

FGEP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
FGEP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FGEP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FGEP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FGEP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FGEP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CGRA.TO

CGRA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
CGRA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CGRA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CGRA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CGRA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CGRA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO) and CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGEP.TO	CGRA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.13	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.33	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.71	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	2.82	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.37	10.45	+5.92

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGEP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the CGRA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGEP.TO and CGRA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGEP.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum CGRA.TO drawdown of -16.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGEP.TO and CGRA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGEP.TO	CGRA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.78%	-16.03%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-6.43%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.09%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-3.77%	+2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	1.73%	+0.04%

Volatility

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) at 1.30%. This indicates that FGEP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGRA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGEP.TO	CGRA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	1.30%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.26%	6.73%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.42%	8.49%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.71%	12.07%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	11.60%	+1.11%

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGEP.TO has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than CGRA.TO's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGEP.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Dividend Comparison

FGEP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool	3.52%	4.02%	4.14%	4.39%	4.46%	3.89%	2.61%
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGEP.TO and CGRA.TO in my portfolio?

FGEP.TO and CGRA.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FGEP.TO or CGRA.TO?

On fees, CGRA.TO is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGEP.TO or CGRA.TO?

CGRA.TO is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for FGEP.TO.

What is the main difference between FGEP.TO and CGRA.TO?

FGEP.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CGRA.TO is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CI. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for FGEP.TO and 0.97% for CGRA.TO.