PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGDL vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGDL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDL achieves a -6.34% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 4.11% return.


FGDL

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-13.15%
YTD
-6.34%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.59%

YCS

1D
-2.97%
1M
-5.17%
6M
5.08%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
22.90%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
6.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$970.05K$896.65K$1.27M
$2.37M$2.29M$1.56M

FGDL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
-6.34%64.15%27.31%12.92%0.72%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
4.11%9.04%35.41%28.70%-7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDL and YCS is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

-0.37

The correlation between FGDL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (all time) to -0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGDL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGDL
FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGDL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGDLYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

2.53

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

9.53

-7.87

FGDL vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDL and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGDL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDL drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDL and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDLYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-49.56%

+22.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.58%

-8.48%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-23.05%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.16%

-8.48%

-16.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-19.75%

+15.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.43%

2.24%

+10.19%

Volatility

FGDL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) have volatilities of 5.87% and 5.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDLYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.88%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.00%

11.84%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.25%

16.43%

+11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

21.21%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

18.61%

+0.78%

FGDL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGDL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGDL nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FGDL and YCS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to FGDL (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDL dropped -26.58% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, FGDL leads with 27.63% vs 16.96% for YCS. On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FGDL has performed better with a 27.63% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FGDL and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FGDL is categorized as Gold, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FGDL and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGDL and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer