FGDL vs. GOEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both Gold funds - FGDL tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) while GOEX tracks the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FGDL returned 28.79%/yr vs 46.70%/yr for GOEX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGDL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.

Performance

FGDL vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDL achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -10.87% return.

FGDL

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -8.58%
• YTD: -4.86%
• 6M: -8.67%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOEX

• 1D: -4.76%
• 1M: -7.11%
• YTD: -10.87%
• 6M: -15.49%
• 1Y: 57.11%
• 3Y*: 46.70%
• 5Y*: 19.54%
• 10Y*: 11.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDL vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	-4.86%	64.15%	27.31%	12.92%	0.72%
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF	-10.87%	179.50%	19.38%	1.99%	7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDL and GOEX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022	0.78

The correlation between FGDL and GOEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGDL vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 21
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

GOEX

GOEX Risk / Return Rank: 31
GOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
GOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDL vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGDL	GOEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.11	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	1.58	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.21	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	1.45	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	3.84	-1.53

FGDL vs. GOEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the GOEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDL and GOEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGDL vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDL drawdown since its inception was -24.73%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDL and GOEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGDL	GOEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.73%	-88.83%	+64.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.73%	-39.64%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.73%	-39.64%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.98%	-34.22%	+10.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-63.47%	+59.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.24%	14.92%	-5.68%

Volatility

FGDL vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) is 8.47%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 18.46%. This indicates that FGDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGDL	GOEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.47%	18.46%	-9.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.48%	42.70%	-18.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.83%	51.52%	-23.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	39.57%	-20.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.33%	40.17%	-20.84%

FGDL vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGDL vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison

FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF	2.33%	2.08%	2.46%	0.05%	1.04%	2.35%	2.62%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	38.91%	11.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGDL and GOEX in my portfolio?

FGDL and GOEX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGDL or GOEX?

GOEX has higher volatility (18.46%) compared to FGDL (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDL dropped -24.73% vs GOEX's -88.83%.

Which ETF is better, FGDL or GOEX?

On 3-year performance, GOEX leads with 46.70% vs 28.79% for FGDL. On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FGDL has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGDL or GOEX?

Over the 3-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 46.70% return vs 28.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGDL or GOEX?

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGDL or GOEX?

GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.

What is the main difference between FGDL and GOEX?

FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FGDL and 0.65% for GOEX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.