FGCKX vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
FGCKX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 15, 2008. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008.
Performance
FGCKX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGCKX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | -6.85% | 18.67% | 37.30% | 47.35% | -33.82% | 22.62% | 67.61% | 38.50% | -4.07% | 36.89% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | -1.71% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGCKX achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than VT's -1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FGCKX has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 19.90%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.
FGCKX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 19.90%
VT
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGCKX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGCKX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
FGCKX
VT
FGCKX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGCKX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.25 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.84 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.83 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 8.51 | -2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGCKX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.25 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.58 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.40 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGCKX and VT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGCKX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.80% | 3.81% | 7.16% | 10.63% | 8.83% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.20% | 3.96% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.82% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
FGCKX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGCKX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, roughly equal to the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCKX and VT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGCKX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -50.27% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -11.84% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.21% | -26.38% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.21% | -34.24% | -5.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.55% | -6.89% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -7.08% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 2.55% | +1.33% |
Volatility
FGCKX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 6.33%. This indicates that FGCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGCKX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 6.33% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 9.95% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.33% | 17.24% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 15.98% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 17.20% | +6.14% |