FGBRX vs. MXGBX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FGBRX (Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R) and MXGBX (Great-West Global Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FGBRX returned -0.02%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for MXGBX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGBRX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for MXGBX.

Performance

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) and Great-West Global Bond Fund (MXGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBRX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than MXGBX's -1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBRX has underperformed MXGBX with an annualized return of -0.02%, while MXGBX has yielded a comparatively higher 0.24% annualized return.

FGBRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 0.54%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: 1.72%
• 5Y*: -1.12%
• 10Y*: -0.02%

MXGBX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -1.87%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: -0.57%
• 3Y*: 2.97%
• 5Y*: -1.73%
• 10Y*: 0.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGBRX Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R	0.92%	14.81%	-12.18%	2.18%	-6.40%	-5.30%	-4.65%	0.38%	1.01%	2.10%
MXGBX Great-West Global Bond Fund	-1.87%	7.54%	-0.88%	5.13%	-14.65%	-6.57%	5.46%	4.08%	-0.27%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBRX and MXGBX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009	0.80

The correlation between FGBRX and MXGBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGBRX vs. MXGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBRX

FGBRX Risk / Return Rank: 9
FGBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FGBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FGBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FGBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FGBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MXGBX

MXGBX Risk / Return Rank: 3
MXGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MXGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MXGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MXGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MXGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) and Great-West Global Bond Fund (MXGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGBRX	MXGBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	-0.06	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	-0.02	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.00	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	-0.09	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.98	-0.30	+2.28

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the MXGBX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBRX and MXGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBRX drawdown since its inception was -27.46%, smaller than the maximum MXGBX drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBRX and MXGBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBRX	MXGBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.46%	-45.02%	+17.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.38%	-6.80%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.09%	-7.25%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	-24.16%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.46%	-26.80%	-0.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.43%	-34.28%	+18.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-20.62%	+12.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.90%	+0.21%

Volatility

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Great-West Global Bond Fund (MXGBX) at 1.40%. This indicates that FGBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGBRX	MXGBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	1.40%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.08%	3.58%	+2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.39%	9.50%	-2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.17%	7.40%	+0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.22%	6.51%	+0.71%

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MXGBX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBRX vs. MXGBX - Dividend Comparison

FGBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than MXGBX's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGBRX Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R	4.39%	4.10%	5.49%	3.61%	4.92%	5.11%	4.34%	5.86%	6.27%	3.08%	2.10%	2.85%
MXGBX Great-West Global Bond Fund	3.13%	3.07%	2.69%	0.84%	1.28%	0.07%	1.05%	3.82%	3.04%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBRX and MXGBX in my portfolio?

FGBRX and MXGBX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGBRX or MXGBX?

FGBRX has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to MXGBX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGBRX dropped -27.46% vs MXGBX's -45.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.