PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGBL.L is traded in GBp, while VHYL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHYL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGBL.L having a 13.76% return and VHYL.L slightly lower at 13.32%. Over the past 10 years, FGBL.L has underperformed VHYL.L with an annualized return of 9.29%, while VHYL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


FGBL.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.06%
6M
10.74%
YTD
13.76%
1Y
29.77%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
9.29%

VHYL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.25%
6M
9.49%
YTD
13.32%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGBL.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
13.76%30.51%6.22%11.15%3.62%10.79%-8.84%11.01%-5.93%11.89%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
13.32%18.23%11.22%5.25%5.95%19.23%-3.53%17.00%-6.59%8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBL.L and VHYL.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2015

0.87

The correlation between FGBL.L and VHYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBL.L
FGBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYL.L
VHYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGBL.LVHYL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.57

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

3.69

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

13.31

+4.89

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBL.L and VHYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.36%, which is greater than VHYL.L's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBL.L and VHYL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGBL.LVHYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.36%

-27.87%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-6.95%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-12.79%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.45%

-12.79%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.44%

-27.87%

-1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.51%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-3.58%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.93%

-0.30%

Volatility

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) at 1.92%. This indicates that FGBL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGBL.LVHYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

1.92%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

6.95%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

8.65%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

10.76%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

12.99%

+0.93%

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGBL.L vs. VHYL.L - Dividend Comparison

FGBL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGBL.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.53%2.79%3.08%3.37%3.67%3.08%3.28%3.34%3.63%3.09%2.88%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGBL.L and VHYL.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FGBL.L.

FGBL.L tracks Nasdaq Global High Equity Income NTR Index, while VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FGBL.L and 0.29% for VHYL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGBL.L and VHYL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer