PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGBL.L is traded in GBp, while VHYA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VHYA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGBL.L having a 13.76% return and VHYA.L slightly lower at 13.51%.


FGBL.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.06%
6M
10.74%
YTD
13.76%
1Y
29.77%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
9.29%

VHYA.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.19%
6M
9.22%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FGBL.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
13.76%30.51%6.22%11.15%3.62%10.79%-8.84%0.61%
VHYA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
13.51%17.96%11.17%5.73%5.90%18.89%-3.15%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBL.L and VHYA.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.77

The correlation between FGBL.L and VHYA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBL.L
FGBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYA.L
VHYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGBL.LVHYA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.42

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

3.61

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

13.65

+4.55

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the VHYA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBL.L and VHYA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.36%, which is greater than VHYA.L's maximum drawdown of -28.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBL.L and VHYA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGBL.LVHYA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.36%

-28.53%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-7.25%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-12.61%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.45%

-12.61%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-1.19%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-3.53%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.92%

-0.29%

Volatility

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) is 2.11%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VHYA.L) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that FGBL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGBL.LVHYA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

2.54%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

8.57%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

11.34%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

12.42%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

15.14%

-1.22%

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYA.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGBL.L vs. VHYA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGBL.L nor VHYA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FGBL.L and VHYA.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYA.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYA.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FGBL.L.

FGBL.L tracks Nasdaq Global High Equity Income NTR Index, while VHYA.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FGBL.L and 0.29% for VHYA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGBL.L and VHYA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer