PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (FGBL.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBL.L achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly higher than CAPS.L's 4.08% return.


FGBL.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.91%
6M
10.70%
YTD
13.08%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
9.31%

CAPS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.27%
6M
1.17%
YTD
4.08%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGBL.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD
13.08%30.51%6.22%11.15%3.62%10.79%-8.98%
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
4.08%-0.65%12.99%2.23%0.52%-6.71%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBL.L and CAPS.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.43

The correlation between FGBL.L and CAPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBL.L
FGBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (FGBL.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGBL.LCAPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-135.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

77.47

-75.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

0.07

+5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.15

0.29

+17.86

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBL.L and CAPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.36%, smaller than the maximum CAPS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBL.L and CAPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGBL.LCAPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.36%

-99.07%

+58.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-99.02%

+93.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-99.07%

+86.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.45%

-99.07%

+86.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-2.63%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-12.90%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

25.17%

-23.54%

Volatility

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (FGBL.L) is 2.12%, while First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that FGBL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGBL.LCAPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

3.75%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

7.95%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.36%

13,922.66%

-13,913.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

6,238.45%

-6,226.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

5,478.19%

-5,464.27%

Dividends

FGBL.L vs. CAPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGBL.L nor CAPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FGBL.L and CAPS.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGBL.L is categorized as Dividend, while CAPS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FGBL.L tracks First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD, while CAPS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGBL.L and CAPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer