FGBAX vs. FHPFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGBAX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A) and FHPFX (Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FGBAX returned -0.18%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FHPFX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGBAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FHPFX.

Performance

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) and Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBAX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than FHPFX's 1.04% return.

FGBAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 3.67%
• 5Y*: -0.18%
• 10Y*: 1.78%

FHPFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 7.30%
• 3Y*: 4.88%
• 5Y*: 0.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGBAX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A	0.21%	6.90%	0.67%	5.86%	-14.15%	-1.38%	9.59%	9.33%	0.68%
FHPFX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund	1.04%	8.76%	1.81%	5.29%	-12.28%	-1.06%	4.84%	6.69%	1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBAX and FHPFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.89

The correlation between FGBAX and FHPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGBAX vs. FHPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBAX

FGBAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FGBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FGBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FGBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FGBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FGBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FHPFX

FHPFX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FHPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FHPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FHPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FHPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FHPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) and Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGBAX	FHPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.81	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.74	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	2.81	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	8.89	-4.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FHPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBAX and FHPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGBAX	FHPFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.81	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.10	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.34	+0.15

Drawdowns

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBAX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than FHPFX's maximum drawdown of -17.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBAX and FHPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBAX	FHPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.94%	-17.93%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.07%	-2.61%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.16%	-7.56%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.88%	-17.79%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-1.06%	-2.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-4.53%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.82%	+0.23%

Volatility

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) is 1.33%, while Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that FGBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGBAX	FHPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.43%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	2.86%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	4.07%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	6.67%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.99%	5.65%	-0.66%

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FHPFX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBAX vs. FHPFX - Dividend Comparison

FGBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than FHPFX's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGBAX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A	3.61%	3.58%	3.07%	2.97%	1.73%	1.09%	4.51%	2.44%	2.54%	1.87%	2.37%	2.36%
FHPFX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund	4.48%	4.41%	4.54%	3.53%	1.70%	0.58%	3.20%	3.81%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBAX and FHPFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FGBAX and FHPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGBAX or FHPFX?

FHPFX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to FGBAX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGBAX dropped -18.94% vs FHPFX's -17.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.