PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGADX vs. SGDLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGADX achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly higher than SGDLX's -2.59% return.


FGADX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-5.45%
1Y
75.31%
3Y*
52.76%
5Y*
22.03%
10Y*
14.40%

SGDLX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
61.32%
3Y*
43.77%
5Y*
19.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGADX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class
-1.74%197.29%17.98%2.20%-23.24%-3.76%48.03%
SGDLX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund
-2.59%147.67%20.58%1.91%-13.21%-11.79%35.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FGADX and SGDLX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.95

The correlation between FGADX and SGDLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGADX vs. SGDLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGADX
FGADX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FGADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGADX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FGADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGADX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDLX
SGDLX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SGDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGADXSGDLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.83

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

4.85

+1.26

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the SGDLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGADX and SGDLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGADX drawdown since its inception was -78.57%, which is greater than SGDLX's maximum drawdown of -47.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGADX and SGDLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGADXSGDLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.57%

-47.59%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.73%

-33.98%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.73%

-33.98%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.77%

-42.98%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.00%

-26.67%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-18.35%

-16.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.59%

12.80%

-0.21%

Volatility

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX) have volatilities of 16.59% and 16.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGADXSGDLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

16.04%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.74%

36.04%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.23%

42.26%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.18%

32.07%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.05%

34.17%

-1.12%

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGADX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDLX's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGADX vs. SGDLX - Dividend Comparison

FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than SGDLX's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FGADX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class
9.99%9.81%12.51%3.09%0.00%8.83%10.06%0.00%0.00%0.62%8.38%
SGDLX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund
0.69%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FGADX and SGDLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGADX has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to SGDLX (16.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGADX dropped -78.57% vs SGDLX's -47.59%.

FGADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGADX and SGDLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer