FGADX vs. INIVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX).
FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010. INIVX is managed by VanEck. It was launched on Feb 9, 1956.
Performance
FGADX vs. INIVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGADX vs. INIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 5.78% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | 0.06% |
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund | 9.59% | 165.88% | 14.37% | 9.67% | -13.77% | -14.23% | 40.91% | 38.15% | -16.01% | 13.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGADX achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than INIVX's 9.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGADX having a 18.40% annualized return and INIVX not far ahead at 18.77%.
FGADX
- 1D
- 8.13%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 122.00%
- 3Y*
- 51.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.76%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
INIVX
- 1D
- 7.01%
- 1M
- -19.57%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 29.50%
- 1Y
- 116.46%
- 3Y*
- 49.06%
- 5Y*
- 25.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGADX vs. INIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGADX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than INIVX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGADX vs. INIVX — Risk / Return Rank
FGADX
INIVX
FGADX vs. INIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGADX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 2.56 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 2.71 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 3.97 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 14.93 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGADX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.56 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.77 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGADX and INIVX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGADX vs. INIVX - Dividend Comparison
FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, more than INIVX's 5.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 9.28% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% |
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund | 5.49% | 6.01% | 7.45% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 11.70% | 3.66% | 2.87% | 3.76% | 6.40% |
Drawdowns
FGADX vs. INIVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGADX drawdown since its inception was -78.57%, roughly equal to the maximum INIVX drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGADX and INIVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGADX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.57% | -78.96% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.15% | -29.60% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -45.06% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.27% | -51.20% | +1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.41% | -19.57% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -37.84% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 7.87% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FGADX vs. INIVX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) has a higher volatility of 18.27% compared to VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) at 17.13%. This indicates that FGADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGADX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.27% | 17.13% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.18% | 38.44% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.06% | 45.71% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 33.66% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.83% | 34.19% | -1.36% |