PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFWTX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class
-0.07%10.16%5.83%9.88%-12.97%5.15%10.45%14.36%-2.58%10.73%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
-1.66%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFWTX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FFWTX has underperformed LTIUX with an annualized return of 5.20%, while LTIUX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.


FFWTX

1D
0.82%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
1.03%
1Y
7.89%
3Y*
7.08%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
5.20%

LTIUX

1D
2.11%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFWTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FFWTX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFWTX
FFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFWTXLTIUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

1.08

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

1.61

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.46

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.11

6.81

+2.30

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFWTX and LTIUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFWTXLTIUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.08

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.72

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.45

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between FFWTX and LTIUX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

FFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than LTIUX's 9.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.56%4.56%5.03%3.32%3.76%3.70%2.59%16.46%4.78%2.64%1.91%1.62%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
9.18%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Drawdowns

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFWTX drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFWTX and LTIUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFWTXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-49.65%

+32.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-8.44%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.44%

-24.23%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.44%

-28.12%

+10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-4.60%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-6.76%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.80%

-0.89%

Volatility

FFWTX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) is 2.22%, while Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that FFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFWTXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

4.44%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

6.70%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.10%

11.29%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

11.83%

-5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.09%

12.47%

-6.38%